Adjuvant radiochemotherapy for gastric cancer. Should we use prognostic factors to select patients?

Radiotherapy has a not well-established role in the pre-operative and in the post-operative setting in gastric cancer (GC) patients. Randomized trials report controversial outcomes and impact on survival. In the D2 loco-regional node resection era, after a well-performed radical surgery, local treatment using radiotherapy combined to chemotherapy should be considered for locally advanced GC. Prognostic factors could help the better selection of subgroups that present high risk of loco-regional recurrence. Then, the addition of radiotherapy could improve the disease-free survival and also quality of life. There are no large prospective studies that have assessed specific factors predicting for recurrence or survival, but only retrospective series, some of them including high number of patients with homogeneous characteristics. In locally advanced GC adding radiotherapy to the post-operative chemotherapy seems to improve outcomes and quality of life. Prognostic factors such as T-stage, N-status, nodal ratio, and other histological factors should be considered to submit patients to post-operative combined treatment. Larger prospective series are necessary to investigate the role of combined chemoradiation after radical D2-resection, especially in locally advanced GC. Further prospective investigations are needed to suggest prognostic factors that have significant impact on survival and recurrence, improving the management and outcomes, particularly in locally advanced GC patients

Patterns of CT lung injury and toxicity after stereotactic radiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy in early stage medically inoperable NSCLC

To evaluate toxicity and patterns of radiologic lung injury on CT images after hypofractionated image-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered with helical tomotherapy (HT) in medically early stage inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Mono-and Bi-weekly hypofractionated radiation therapy for the treatment of epithelial skin cancer in very elderly patients

urs in the elderly population, sometimes in an advanced stage, when intensive treatments are needed. Radiotherapy can achieve high response rates. We evaluated efficacy and tolerability of hypofractionated radiotherapy in a population of very elderly patients with locally advanced epithelial skin cancer. Patients and Methods: Two different hypofractionated schedules were administered (21 patients): 6 Gy in 10 bi-weekly fractions (13 lesions) and 5 Gy in 12 bi-weekly fractions (13 lesions). Median age at treatment was 88 years, life expectancy was ≤5 years in 90.5%. Results: The overall response rate was 96.1%, with 92.4% complete responses. All patients experienced an improvement of their symptoms and a reduction of pain and medication. The median overall survival time was 28 months (95% confidence interval=4.7-51.2 months). At the time of analysis, 52.3% of patients had died. Conclusion: Hypofractionated radiotherapy is an effective option of treatment, with low toxicity and optimal results, and can also be safely administered to these frail patients. Epithelial skin cancer is a common neoplasm. The m

Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy?

The most popular therapeutic option in the management of radio-recurrent prostatic carcinoma is represented by the androgen deprivation therapy, that however should be considered only palliative and hampered by potential adverse effects of testosterone suppression. Local therapies such as surgery, cryoablation or brachytherapy might be curative choices for patients in good conditions and with a long-life expectancy, but at cost of significant risk of failure and severe toxicity. The administration of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in this setting have come about because of tremendous technologic advances in image guidance and treatment delivery techniques that enable the delivery of large doses to tumor with reduced margins and high gradients outside the target, thereby reducing the volume of rectum which already received significant doses from primary radiotherapy. So far, very modest data are available to support its employment. Rationale, clinical experience, and challenges are herein reviewed and discussed

Retreatment for prostate cancer with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT): Feasible or foolhardy?

tThe most popular therapeutic option in the management of radio-recurrent prostaticcarcinoma is represented by the androgen deprivation therapy, that however should beconsidered only palliative and hampered by potential adverse effects of testosterone sup-pression. Local therapies such as surgery, cryoablation or brachytherapy might be curativechoices for patients in good conditions and with a long-life expectancy, but at cost of sig-nificant risk of failure and severe toxicity. The administration of stereotactic body radiationtherapy (SBRT) in this setting have come about because of tremendous technologic advancesin image guidance and treatment delivery techniques that enable the delivery of large dosesto tumor with reduced margins and high gradients outside the target, thereby reducing thevolume of rectum which already received significant doses from primary radiotherapy. Sofar, very modest data are available to support its employment. Rationale, clinical experience,and challenges are herein reviewed and discussed

Lung Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy in Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors After Long-Term Follow-Up

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a series of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in all active lung metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with 69 lung metastases were treated with SABR. Eleven patients presented with other sites of metastases before stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), even though they had controlled/cured systemic disease. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 38 months and 2 years, 3-year OS rates were 67.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months and 2 years, 3-year PFS rates were 20.3% and 16.2%, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 16 patients (36%).The first site of failure was local only in 22%, distant only in 35%, and local and distant in 14% of the patients. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local PFS (LPFS) were 68.8%, 60.2%, and 54.2%, respectively. No Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were recorded in the univariate analysis; multiple lung metastases and synchronous oligometastatic disease were significantly associated with worse PFS (P = .04, and P < .001, respectively) and worse metastases-free survival (MFS; P = .04, and P < .001, respectively). The type of response was identified as a significant prognostic factor for OS (P = .014), PFS (P = .006), and LPFS (P < .001). In multivariate analysis single lung metastases treated with SBRT was associated with better MFS (P = .015). Metachronous oligometastatic disease and type of response were associated with significantly better PFS. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a valid therapy in the treatment of lung metastases for oligometastatic CRC patients presenting long survival. The rate of local control remains lower compared with other primaries. Further prospective cohorts would better evaluate effective fractionation for patients with oligometastatic CRC. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.BACKGROUND: We evaluated a series of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) delivered in all active lung metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four patients with 69 lung metastases were treated with SABR. Eleven patients presented with other sites of metastases before stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), even though they had controlled/cured systemic disease. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 36 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 38 months and 2 years, 3-year OS rates were 67.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10 months and 2 years, 3-year PFS rates were 20.3% and 16.2%, respectively. Local recurrence occurred in 16 patients (36%).The first site of failure was local only in 22%, distant only in 35%, and local and distant in 14% of the patients. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year local PFS (LPFS) were 68.8%, 60.2%, and 54.2%, respectively. No Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were recorded in the univariate analysis; multiple lung metastases and synchronous oligometastatic disease were significantly associated with worse PFS (P = .04, and P < .001, respectively) and worse metastases-free survival (MFS; P = .04, and P < .001, respectively). The type of response was identified as a significant prognostic factor for OS (P = .014), PFS (P = .006), and LPFS (P < .001). In multivariate analysis single lung metastases treated with SBRT was associated with better MFS (P = .015). Metachronous oligometastatic disease and type of response were associated with significantly better PFS. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a valid therapy in the treatment of lung metastases for oligometastatic CRC patients presenting long survival. The rate of local control remains lower compared with other primaries. Further prospective cohorts would better evaluate effective fractionation for patients with oligometastatic CRC. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Different outcomes among favourable and unfavourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy

BACKGROUND: to evaluate the role of a risk stratification system in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy (HyRT). METHODS: 131 patients affected by intermediate-risk PCa were treated with HyRT at the total dose of 54,75 Gy in 15 fraction plus 9 months of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Patients were classified as favourable risk (FIR) if they had a single NCCN intermediate-risk factor (IRF), a Gleason score ≤3 + 4 = 7, and <50 % of biopsy cores containing cancer (PBCC). If these criteria were not met were classified as unfavourable risk (UIR). Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards model were calculated for biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), the risk of local recurrence and metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 56.7 months (range 9.8 to 93.7 months), 11 patients (8.4 %) died, of whom 2 (1.5 %) for PCa. In the univariate analysis, Gleason score, PPBCs, IRFs and PSA at first follow-up were prognostic factors for bRFS and LF while Gleason score, PPBCs and PSA at first follow-up were significant predictor for MFS. In the multivariate analysis only the PSA at first follow-up resulted a prognostic factor for bRFS and MFS. Patients with a value of PSA at first follow-up <0.7 ng/mL respect to those with PSA ≥0,7 ng/mL had a 5y-bRFS of 93.3 % vs. 57.5 %, 5y-MFS of 99.0 % vs. 78.9 % and 5y-LF of 5.8 % vs. 38.3 %. Patients in the UIR PCa group with a PSA value <0.7 ng/mL at first follow-up had significant better bRFS, LF and MFS. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors currently not included in the guidelines are useful to stratify patients with intermediate-risk PCa in two groups of different prognosis even when HyRT is delivered. PSA at first follow-up is useful in UIR PCa to guide the overall length of ADT

Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors might help to reduce the development of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis after stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the role of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in preventing symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP) after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data from 158 patients with a solitary lung lesion treated with 1 to 3 fractions of SBRT from December 2008 to July 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of RP was evaluated according to the Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) was analyzed to assess for possible correlations with the development of grade ≥ 2 RP. The patient and dosimetric variables were also assessed. RESULTS: After a median follow-up period of 13.8 months (range, 3.2-55.0 months), 22 patients had developed grade ≥ 2 RP. Patients with peripheral lesions, favorable dosimetric data, and ACEI and/or ARB use had a reduced risk of symptomatic RP. In unadjusted and adjusted multivariate analyses, ACEI and/or ARB intake and the dosimetric variables were statistically significant factors. In a secondary analysis, the use of ACEIs and ARBs among patients with a greater planning target volume and higher dosimetric values correlated with a reduced risk of symptomatic RP CONCLUSION: The use of a RAS inhibitor was associated with a decreased incidence of symptomatic RP among patients undergoing SBRT for lung lesions. Patients with higher dosimetric values had a reduced risk of grade ≥ 2 RP with ACEI and ARB use